Editorial standards and corrections policy
This page sets out how wherelegalcrypto produces its content, who is responsible for it, and how to get an error fixed. It applies to every page on the site.
Our standard, in one line
Information, never advice, and accuracy over coverage. Every page states it is general information, names the relevant regulator, dates every legal and tax claim, and carries a visible last reviewed date. A missing page is fine. A wrong page is not.
How we research
We read primary sources first: the official regulator, the relevant statute or rule, the official register of licensed or registered providers, public enforcement actions, and, for availability, the platform's own terms of use. We prefer the source a careful reader could check over secondary summaries.
Who reviews content
wherelegalcrypto is edited by its two co founders, Morten Andersen and Fredrik Filipsson, who are named on the editorial team page and are accountable for every status the site publishes. Specialist calls are matched to the founder whose focus covers them.
How we date and refresh
Every legal or tax claim carries an as of date, and every page carries a last reviewed date set when we last checked it. We re review the highest traffic country and exchange pages on a regular cycle and re date them when a rule changes.
Corrections and how to flag an error
If a status is out of date, a source has moved, or a line is wrong, tell us through the contact page and point us to the source if you have one. We act on corrections quickly and update the dates on the page when we make a change.
Commercial disclosure
We fund the site through display advertising and affiliate links. An affiliate link appears only after the information and only where the platform is genuinely available to that country. A commercial relationship never changes a status, and we never present an affiliate link as an editorial pick.
Common questions
How do you decide a legality or availability status?
We start from primary sources: the official regulator, the statute or rule, the official register, public enforcement actions, and the platform's own terms of use. We grade a clear status only where the sources support it. Where the position is unclear or contested, we label it unclear rather than guessing.
How do you handle corrections?
Every page shows a last reviewed date and names the regulator and source so a reader can check it. If you find an error or an out of date status, tell us through the contact page. We check reported errors quickly, fix the line, and update the as of and last reviewed dates when we make a change.
Do you use AI to write pages?
We use software to assemble and format pages at scale, but every legality and availability status is researched against primary sources and is the responsibility of a named editor. We do not publish a status that a person has not stood behind.
How do you disclose affiliate links?
We use display advertising and affiliate links to exchanges and tools. An affiliate link appears only after the information and only where the platform is genuinely available to that country. A commercial relationship never changes a legality status or an availability call, and we never present an affiliate link as an editorial pick.
How often are pages reviewed?
We re review the highest traffic country and exchange pages on a regular cycle and update the as of and last reviewed dates when a rule changes. Freshness matters in this niche, so dating and re dating pages is part of the standard, not an afterthought.